vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $745.1M, roughly 1.2× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 9.8%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $-64.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
ENS vs LTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $745.1M |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $123.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $745.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $761.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $706.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $663.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $693.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $667.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $596.7M |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $76.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 46.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $204.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $239.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $-64.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 40.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $-21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $239.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $163.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $170.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $90.4M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-66.4M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 3.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 3.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
LTH
| Membership | $535.1M | 72% |
| In Center | $191.2M | 26% |
| Other | $18.8M | 3% |
