vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESAB Corp (ESAB) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $727.8M, roughly 1.5× ESAB Corp). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 7.5%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESAB Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $70.3M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 2.8%).
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ESAB vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $727.8M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $54.8M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.90 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $727.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $715.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $678.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $689.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.4M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.2M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.0% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.09 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.11 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.2M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.2M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.2M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $291.3M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.4M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.7M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $228.5M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.5M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $992.8M | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $81.5M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.3M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.49× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $81.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.4M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.9M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.5M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $70.3M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.74× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESAB
| Consumable Products | $477.9M | 66% |
| Equipment Products | $249.9M | 34% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
