vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evercore Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 14.3%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
EVR vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
