vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 6.5%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
EVRG vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
