vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (FRSX) and Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Safe Pro Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($227.7K vs $128.0K, roughly 1.8× Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd.). Safe Pro Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1507.6% vs -2155.5%, a 647.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.6M vs $-2.7M).
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. develops and markets advanced perception systems for the autonomous driving and automotive safety sectors. Its core offerings include multi-sensor vision solutions combining thermal imaging, visible light and AI analytics to enhance obstacle detection, collision avoidance and navigation reliability for passenger cars, commercial fleets and off-road industrial equipment, with operations spanning North America, Europe and Asia.
FRSX vs SPAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $128.0K | $227.7K |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2305.5% | -1936.2% |
| Net Margin | -2155.5% | -1507.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $227.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $128.0K | $92.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $330.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $643.0K | ||
| Q2 22 | $213.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-10.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 22 | 57.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1936.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4148.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2305.5% | -2073.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2167.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1070.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2602.4% | -174.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | -1936.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1507.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4940.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2155.5% | -2064.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2145.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1114.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2578.9% | -188.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | -4749.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $146.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $17.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.5M | $19.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $35.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | $531.4K | ||
| Q2 22 | $37.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $41.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.6M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | $-2.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2041.4% | -1181.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-6.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-941.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-960.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1181.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1579.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2041.4% | -1092.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -519.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -577.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2080.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -1571.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 32.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
