vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($891.0M vs $625.5M, roughly 1.4× Global-E Online Ltd.). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 0.9%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Global-E Online Ltd. operates a leading cross-border e-commerce enablement platform that helps direct-to-consumer brands and retail enterprises expand their international sales reach. It offers end-to-end services including localized checkout, payment processing, customs clearance, logistics coordination, and duty calculation, serving clients across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
GLBE vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $625.5M | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.8M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $625.5M | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.8M | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $189.9M | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $489.9M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.9M | $777.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.9M | $742.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-77.1M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-54.5M | $201.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $251.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $933.0M | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $544.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $933.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.1M | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $884.3M | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $869.4M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $886.9M | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $87.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $87.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $261.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $231.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
