vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $319.1M, roughly 1.6× ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs 6.1%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 3.2%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $127.1M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 1.4%).

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. is a registered data broker in the United States. The company collects and sells personal data, both public and private, through various means of data and web scraping. Information about business entities like companies and departments are also collected and offered. These personal information are available for sale, where other businesses can use the collected data for targeted marketing.

Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.

GTM vs WWW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WWW
WWW
1.6× larger
WWW
$517.5M
$319.1M
GTM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WWW
WWW
+22.3% gap
WWW
25.5%
3.2%
GTM
Higher net margin
GTM
GTM
4.7% more per $
GTM
10.9%
6.1%
WWW
More free cash flow
WWW
WWW
$18.5M more FCF
WWW
$145.6M
$127.1M
GTM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WWW
WWW
Annualised
WWW
14.5%
1.4%
GTM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Revenue
$319.1M
$517.5M
Net Profit
$34.7M
$31.8M
Gross Margin
84.0%
47.3%
Operating Margin
17.0%
9.7%
Net Margin
10.9%
6.1%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
25.5%
Net Profit YoY
137.7%
162.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.37

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$517.5M
Q4 25
$319.1M
Q3 25
$318.0M
$470.3M
Q2 25
$306.7M
$474.2M
Q1 25
$305.7M
$412.3M
Q4 24
$309.1M
$494.7M
Q3 24
$303.6M
$440.2M
Q2 24
$291.5M
$425.2M
Net Profit
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$31.8M
Q4 25
$34.7M
Q3 25
$38.7M
$25.1M
Q2 25
$24.0M
$26.8M
Q1 25
$26.8M
$12.1M
Q4 24
$14.6M
$23.1M
Q3 24
$23.8M
$23.2M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$13.8M
Gross Margin
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
47.3%
Q4 25
84.0%
Q3 25
83.7%
47.5%
Q2 25
83.9%
47.2%
Q1 25
84.5%
47.2%
Q4 24
82.8%
43.4%
Q3 24
84.4%
45.1%
Q2 24
84.3%
43.1%
Operating Margin
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
9.7%
Q4 25
17.0%
Q3 25
21.2%
8.4%
Q2 25
17.5%
8.6%
Q1 25
16.5%
4.8%
Q4 24
10.0%
7.4%
Q3 24
14.3%
7.9%
Q2 24
-6.9%
6.8%
Net Margin
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
6.1%
Q4 25
10.9%
Q3 25
12.2%
5.3%
Q2 25
7.8%
5.7%
Q1 25
8.8%
2.9%
Q4 24
4.7%
4.7%
Q3 24
7.8%
5.3%
Q2 24
-8.4%
3.2%
EPS (diluted)
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$0.37
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$0.12
$0.30
Q2 25
$0.07
$0.32
Q1 25
$0.08
$0.15
Q4 24
$0.04
$0.29
Q3 24
$0.07
$0.28
Q2 24
$-0.07
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$179.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
$621.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$408.0M
Total Assets
$6.4B
$1.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.88×
1.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$179.9M
Q3 25
$135.0M
Q2 25
$176.9M
Q1 25
$140.5M
Q4 24
$139.9M
Q3 24
$147.7M
Q2 24
$399.3M
Total Debt
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$621.7M
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$676.4M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$708.5M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$710.8M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$648.0M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$702.8M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$814.7M
Stockholders' Equity
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$408.0M
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$376.7M
Q2 25
$1.6B
$344.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$310.6M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$312.9M
Q3 24
$1.7B
$295.2M
Q2 24
$1.9B
$262.1M
Total Assets
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$6.4B
Q3 25
$6.4B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$6.5B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$6.4B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$6.5B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$6.4B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$6.7B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
1.52×
Q4 25
0.88×
Q3 25
0.87×
1.80×
Q2 25
0.85×
2.06×
Q1 25
0.75×
2.29×
Q4 24
0.72×
2.07×
Q3 24
0.74×
2.38×
Q2 24
0.66×
3.11×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$143.5M
$146.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$127.1M
$145.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
39.8%
28.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.1%
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.14×
4.60×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$389.3M
$125.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$146.2M
Q4 25
$143.5M
Q3 25
$93.8M
$33.0M
Q2 25
$108.9M
$44.6M
Q1 25
$119.2M
$-83.8M
Q4 24
$109.0M
$82.4M
Q3 24
$18.2M
$108.2M
Q2 24
$126.3M
$26.7M
Free Cash Flow
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
$145.6M
Q4 25
$127.1M
Q3 25
$70.9M
$30.1M
Q2 25
$86.9M
$41.2M
Q1 25
$104.4M
$-91.4M
Q4 24
$85.6M
$74.4M
Q3 24
$600.0K
$104.1M
Q2 24
$115.2M
$23.7M
FCF Margin
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
28.1%
Q4 25
39.8%
Q3 25
22.3%
6.4%
Q2 25
28.3%
8.7%
Q1 25
34.2%
-22.2%
Q4 24
27.7%
15.0%
Q3 24
0.2%
23.6%
Q2 24
39.5%
5.6%
Capex Intensity
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
0.1%
Q4 25
5.1%
Q3 25
7.2%
0.6%
Q2 25
7.2%
0.7%
Q1 25
4.8%
1.8%
Q4 24
7.6%
1.6%
Q3 24
5.8%
0.9%
Q2 24
3.8%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
GTM
GTM
WWW
WWW
Q1 26
4.60×
Q4 25
4.14×
Q3 25
2.42×
1.31×
Q2 25
4.54×
1.66×
Q1 25
4.45×
-6.93×
Q4 24
7.47×
3.57×
Q3 24
0.76×
4.66×
Q2 24
1.93×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTM
GTM

Segment breakdown not available.

WWW
WWW

Sales Channel Through Intermediary$230.2M44%
Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$142.6M28%
Work Group$134.0M26%
Other$10.7M2%

Related Comparisons