vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. (HCWC) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.3× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -8.9%, a 46.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-927.1K vs $-3.6M).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
HCWC vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -8.9% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-339.4K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-712.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.1% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 41.8% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -49.9% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -82.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-10.66 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.3M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $33.5M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.00× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $32.3M |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $42.7M |
| Q4 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 8.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-855.1K | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-927.1K | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.0% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $675.4K | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-855.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.7K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-950.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-927.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-351.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.6K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $965.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -31.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -70.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCWC
| Retail Grocery | $17.1M | 91% |
| Food Service Restaurant | $1.7M | 9% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.