vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. (HCWC) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HEALTHY CHOICE WELLNESS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.5M, roughly 1.4× UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -8.9%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $-927.1K).
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
HCWC vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | -8.9% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-339.4K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-712.4K | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -8.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.29 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3M | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $33.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-855.1K | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-927.1K | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.0% | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $675.4K | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-855.1K | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.7K | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-927.1K | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-351.3K | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.6K | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $965.3K | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCWC
| Retail Grocery | $17.1M | 91% |
| Food Service Restaurant | $1.7M | 9% |
UBFO
Segment breakdown not available.
