vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($624.4M vs $361.3M, roughly 1.7× Utz Brands, Inc.). On growth, Utz Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -33.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
HHH vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $624.4M | $361.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -33.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $361.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $356.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $19.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $73.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $709.5M |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $73.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $66.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $709.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $686.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $360.3M | $-12.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $348.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 60.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $417.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | $8.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $-15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
