vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $871.0M, roughly 1.3× IES Holdings, Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 10.5%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IES Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.2% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-18.9M). Over the past eight quarters, IES Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 3.1%).
IES Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems and provides infrastructure products and services to a variety of end markets, including data centers, residential housing, and commercial and industrial facilities.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
IESC vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $871.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $91.8M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.51 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $871.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $897.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $834.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $749.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.3M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.5M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $4.51 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.99 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.72 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.06 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.67 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $258.7M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $961.1M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.7M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.8M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.3M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.9M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.0M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $961.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $884.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $781.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $705.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $611.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.8M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.30× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $175.9M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.3M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.8M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.1M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.4M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.34× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IESC
| Communications | $351.9M | 40% |
| Single Family Electrical Contracts | $137.0M | 16% |
| Custom Engineered Solutions | $116.0M | 13% |
| Commercialand Industrial | $94.8M | 11% |
| Single Family Contracts Plumbing HVAC | $82.9M | 10% |
| Multi Familyand Other | $64.2M | 7% |
| Industrial Services | $24.2M | 3% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
