vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T1 Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.7× IMAX CORP). IMAX CORP runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -62.0%, a 62.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $28.0M).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
IMAX vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
