vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERGROUP CORP (INTG) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERGROUP CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.2× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). INTERGROUP CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.8% vs -2.0%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERGROUP CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Intergroup Corp is a diversified holding firm operating two core segments: real estate and hotel operations. It owns, manages and leases commercial and residential properties across the U.S., and runs limited-service hotels for leisure and business travelers.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
INTG vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.3M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.5M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.8% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.8% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 155.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-535.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-578.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-398.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.7% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.25 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.26 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.5M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $233.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-85.2M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $101.1M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $225.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-85.2M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.7M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.1M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-84.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-83.9M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-80.9M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-80.3M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.1M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.5M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.1M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.2M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.3M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.8M | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.0K | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-481.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $739.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-296.0K | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-854.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-781.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-481.0K | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.8% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.02× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INTG
| Hotel Operations | $12.7M | 73% |
| Real Estate Operation | $4.6M | 27% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
