vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.0× JBG SMITH Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -35.7%, a 52.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
JBGS vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
