vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBT Marel Corp (JBTM) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $517.5M, roughly 1.9× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 5.3%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 25.5%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 14.5%).
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
JBTM vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 115.6% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 858.6% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.04 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.8M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $854.1M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.6M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.8M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.3M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-173.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.9M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.26 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.35 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $648.3M | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.7M | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $117.4M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.5M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.21× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.1M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.7M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.2M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.9M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.7M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.0M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.06× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBTM
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
