vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JOINT Corp (JYNT) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $15.2M, roughly 1.8× JOINT Corp). JOINT Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -72.1%, a 78.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JOINT Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -28.5%). JOINT Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($334.7K vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, JOINT Corp's revenue compounded faster (-28.6% CAGR vs -29.7%).
The Joint Corp is a leading operator and franchisor of chiropractic care clinics primarily serving the U.S. market. It offers accessible, affordable routine chiropractic services, membership-based care plans, and caters to consumers seeking non-invasive musculoskeletal pain management and wellness support.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
JYNT vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $991.1K | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5510.5% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $991.1K | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $855.0K | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4K | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $967.8K | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7K | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $947.0K | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.1% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.3% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.7% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.7% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 90.9% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.2% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.5% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.6M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.1M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $61.0M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.7M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.7M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.7M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $61.0M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.4M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.2M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.2M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.7M | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $334.7K | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.9% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.86× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.9M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-973.5K | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $334.7K | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.6K | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.8% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 532.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JYNT
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.8M | 84% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 16% |
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
