vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $432.7M, roughly 1.2× Koppers Holdings Inc.). Koppers Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 6.1%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs -9.3%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $28.5M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
KOP vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $432.7M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 391.2% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.44 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $432.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.3M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.8M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.5M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.0M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.3M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.2M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.17 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.68 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.47 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $928.3M | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $574.0M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.62× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $928.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.9M | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.5M | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.0M | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $939.5M | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $989.4M | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $574.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.8M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.3M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $509.2M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.92× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.1M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.5M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.52× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.5M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.2M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.6M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
