vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LITHIA MOTORS INC (LAD) and RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ (RUSHA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LITHIA MOTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2B vs $1.7B, roughly 5.5× RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\). RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs 1.5%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LITHIA MOTORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.3% vs -12.5%). RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.9M vs $30.5M). Over the past eight quarters, LITHIA MOTORS INC's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Lithia Motors, Inc. is an American nationwide automotive dealership group headquartered in Medford, Oregon. As of 2025, Lithia is the largest automotive retailer in the United States by revenue, ahead of competitors such as AutoNation and Penske Automotive Group. As of December 31, 2024, Lithia operates 459 dealership locations across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company employs approximately 30,000 people worldwide.
Rush Enterprises is an American commercial vehicle dealership headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas. It primarily sells new and used trucks, through its Rush Truck Centers. In 2019, the company operated over 200 Rush Truck Centers in 20 U.S. states as well as 14 locations in Canada. As of 2020, it was a Fortune 500 corporation.
LAD vs RUSHA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $136.9M | $64.3M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 20.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | -12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -36.6% | -13.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.90 | $0.81 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $64.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $217.1M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.1M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.5M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.1M | $74.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.1M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.6M | $71.6M |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.6% | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.61 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.87 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.94 | $0.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.09 | $-95.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.80 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.87 | $97.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.89 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $212.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $274.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.6B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $212.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.5M | $242.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $211.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.4M | $228.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.8M | $185.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.4M | $167.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.4M | $155.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $408.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $25.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.23× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $123.7M | $112.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.5M | $31.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.90× | 1.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.8M | $462.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $123.7M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-98.4M | $367.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $227.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.1M | $153.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.8M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.3M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-148.4M | $270.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $292.4M | $-155.1M |
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-207.3M | $271.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.8M | $113.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $45.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.7M | $263.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.1M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-278.5M | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.8M | $-234.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.45× | 5.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | 3.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.54× | 2.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | 5.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.69× | 3.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.80× | -2.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LAD
Segment breakdown not available.
RUSHA
| New And Used Commercial Vehicle | $1.0B | 62% |
| Parts | $364.2M | 22% |
| Commercial Vehicle Repair Service | $261.0M | 16% |
| Insurance | $2.5M | 0% |
| Financial Service | $2.3M | 0% |
