vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.2M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.1× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -27.4%, a 54.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
LARK vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-12.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $650.8K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $4.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $18.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-803.1K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
