vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) and Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Local Bounti Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $7.6M, roughly 1.6× Marygold Companies, Inc.). Marygold Companies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.5% vs -69.8%, a 62.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Local Bounti Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Local Bounti Corporation's revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Local Bounti Corporation is a U.S.-based sustainable indoor agriculture firm growing fresh, pesticide-free leafy greens, herbs and produce via advanced hydroponic and vertical farming tech. It serves North American retail and food service partners, focusing on low environmental impact and stable year-round supply.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
LOCL vs MGLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5M | $7.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.7M | $-576.0K |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -106.1% | -8.3% |
| Net Margin | -69.8% | -7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | -4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.0% | 67.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $-576.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.4M | $-356.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.7M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.1M | $-529.0K |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 75.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 74.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 70.5% |
| Q4 25 | -106.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -149.4% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -127.7% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -135.6% | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -166.6% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -176.0% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -146.8% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -122.9% | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | -69.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -216.6% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -178.3% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -324.6% | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -360.1% | -21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.2% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -267.6% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -286.9% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.52 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.63 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.32 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.24 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.00 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.89 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $11.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-166.2M | $22.7M |
| Total Assets | $410.5M | $27.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $937.0K | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.0K | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | $483.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $484.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $480.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $329.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-166.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-158.1M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-132.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-134.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-100.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.8M | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $410.5M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.8M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.8M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $447.2M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.8M | $35.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.1M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.4M | $33.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.1M | $-908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -29.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-42.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.1M | $-908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.9M | $-533.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.7M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-770.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.2M | $-893.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-658.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.1M | $-562.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.6M | $-776.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.0M | $-940.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -82.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -121.0% | -46.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -293.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -305.4% | -23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -501.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 97.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 125.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 263.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 417.3% | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCL
Segment breakdown not available.
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
