vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Magnera Corp (MAGN) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $792.0M, roughly 1.4× Magnera Corp). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -4.3%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnera Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Magnera Corp's revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
MAGN vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $792.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-34.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -4.3% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.95 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $792.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $839.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $702.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $558.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-34.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.95 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.15 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.69 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.44 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.86× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.9M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.2M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $877.4M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.7M | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.86× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-74.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.43× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAGN
| Other | $451.0M | 57% |
| United States And Canada | $341.0M | 43% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
