vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $188.3M, roughly 1.5× BRC Group Holdings, Inc.). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 47.9% vs 15.3%, a 32.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRC Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-21.9% vs -29.1%).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
MATW vs RILY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $188.3M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $90.3M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 79.5% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 32.3% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 47.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | -21.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | 1710.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $2.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $188.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.4M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-284.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-433.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-49.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 79.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.3% |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -90.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -169.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $2.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $226.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $-171.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $190.7M |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | $-171.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-351.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-496.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-488.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-497.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-218.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | 0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-60.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $111.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
RILY
| Transferred At Point In Time | $101.4M | 54% |
| Wealth Management Segment | $30.7M | 16% |
| Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees | $27.1M | 14% |
| Services And Fees | $24.8M | 13% |
| Commissions Fees And Reimbursed Expenses | $4.8M | 3% |
