vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.9M vs $7.6M, roughly 1.9× Marygold Companies, Inc.). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -7.5%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs -4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
MGLD vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.5% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-356.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.0% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.8% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.3% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.5% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $27.8M | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-908.0K | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-908.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-533.0K | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-770.0K | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-893.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-562.0K | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-776.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-940.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
