vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.4M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.2× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs -2.0%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs 18.2%).
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns and operates a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net lease commercial properties across the United States. Its core asset segments include essential retail, industrial, and suburban office spaces, delivering stable recurring rental revenue to support consistent returns for its shareholders.
MRAM vs PINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.9M | $18.4M |
| Net Profit | $-296.0K | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 35.4% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 285.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $16.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $12.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-296.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-670.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-958.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $204.0K |
| Q1 26 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 29.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.5% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | -2.0% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.01 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.5M | $2.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.2M | $312.5M |
| Total Assets | $83.2M | $745.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $40.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $3.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $377.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $358.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $352.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $356.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $301.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $268.3M |
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | $312.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $279.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.8M | $223.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.1M | $229.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $240.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | $253.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $244.0M |
| Q1 26 | $83.2M | $745.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $715.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $628.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.2M | $647.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $605.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $579.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $565.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $570.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $570.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $881.0K | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-975.0K | $-87.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.0K | $-48.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $527.0K | $-55.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-13.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | -519.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -334.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | -20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -391.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -242.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | -319.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -108.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 671.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 394.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 81.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 432.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 412.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 365.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 172.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | 17.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | 2.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
PINE
| Lease Income | $12.6M | 68% |
| Other | $5.8M | 31% |
| Other Revenue | $46.0K | 0% |
