vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($334.0M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.6× MATRIX SERVICE CO). MATRIX SERVICE CO runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -18.0%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MATRIX SERVICE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs -76.3%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, MATRIX SERVICE CO's revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
MTRX vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.5M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $-894.0K | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.8% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $210.5M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.9M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.4M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.2M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.6M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-894.0K | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.20 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.0M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $137.6M | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $650.2M | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $224.6M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.8M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.6M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.6M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.6M | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.3M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.7M | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.7M | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.9M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.5M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.2M | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $598.2M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $600.3M | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $513.8M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $470.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.4M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.5M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.3M | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.0% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $45.5M | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.0M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.9M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
