vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7M vs $2.5M, roughly 1.1× NSTS Bancorp, Inc.). NSTS Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 214.3% vs -697.1%, a 911.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. NSTS Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.9M vs $-42.0M).
NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company. It offers a comprehensive suite of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal loans, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual consumers and small-to-medium enterprises in its regional operating areas.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
NSTS vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $135.0K | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | 214.3% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 393.5% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $135.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.0K | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-258.0K | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-328.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0K | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-171.0K | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-326.0K | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-246.0K | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.1% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.2% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -71.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 214.3% | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.1% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.2% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -71.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $80.0M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $266.6M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.1M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.4M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.5M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.5M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.0M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $266.6M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $269.8M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.7M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $278.7M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $268.4M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.9M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $265.6M | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.1M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.9M | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 156.9% | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.1% | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 30.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.7M | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $655.0K | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.0K | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $616.0K | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0K | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | 156.9% | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 113.9% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -126.1% | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 373.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -76.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
