vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR) and WEST BANCORPORATION INC (WTBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEST BANCORPORATION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.0× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). WEST BANCORPORATION INC runs the higher net margin — 39.2% vs -72.1%, a 111.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WEST BANCORPORATION INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs -28.5%). WEST BANCORPORATION INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.4M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, WEST BANCORPORATION INC's revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -29.7%).
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
West Bancorporation Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Midwest, primarily serving markets across Iowa and Minnesota. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, business lending, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small-to-medium enterprises, and local organizational clients.
OSUR vs WTBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-19.3M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -75.1% | 50.0% |
| Net Margin | -72.1% | 39.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -28.5% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -78.7% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.3M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-19.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-615.0K | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -75.1% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.7% | 43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | 32.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -72.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.6% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.3M | $362.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.8M | $270.7M |
| Total Assets | $403.2M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.3M | $471.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.5M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.6M | $345.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.8M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $340.8M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.7M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.3M | $237.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.3M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.6M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.8M | $223.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $457.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $479.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $464.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.3M | $4.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.0M | $12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.9M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.1% | 46.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-53.2M | $79.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0K | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-347.0K | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -37.1% | 178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -38.9% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.3% | 35.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.9% | 65.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 125.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
WTBA
Segment breakdown not available.
