vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 14.3%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 1.7%). Teradyne produced more free cash flow last quarter ($218.8M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
SCI vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
