vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and Trade Desk (The) (TTD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $846.8M, roughly 1.3× Trade Desk (The)). Trade Desk (The) runs the higher net margin — 22.1% vs 14.3%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trade Desk (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 1.7%). Trade Desk (The) produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.3M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Trade Desk (The)'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
The Trade Desk, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in real-time programmatic marketing automation technologies, products, and services, designed to personalize digital content delivery to users.
SCI vs TTD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $846.8M |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $186.9M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 30.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 22.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 2.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $846.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $739.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $694.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $616.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $741.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $584.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $491.3M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $182.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $94.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $31.7M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 80.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 78.9% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $311.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $285.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 33.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $795.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $311.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $224.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $291.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $273.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $185.5M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $158.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $232.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $179.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $224.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $59.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $178.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 5.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 5.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
TTD
| Other | $427.2M | 50% |
| Non Us | $419.6M | 50% |