vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $625.1M, roughly 1.8× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 13.4%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 1.7%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
SCI vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
