vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× Take-Two Interactive). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -5.5%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs 24.9%). Take-Two Interactive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.2M vs $41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
SGI vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $140.8M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 54.7% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.8% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $140.8M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.4M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.1M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.1M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 44.0% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.9% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.9% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.1% | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.47 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $559.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.5M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.8M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.6M | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $12.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.92× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.4M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.1M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $633.2M | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.4M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.2M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.1M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.4M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.6M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.2M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $360.3M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.4M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.2M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.7M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
