vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI) and TREASURE GLOBAL INC (TGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Safe Pro Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($227.7K vs $182.5K, roughly 1.2× TREASURE GLOBAL INC). TREASURE GLOBAL INC runs the higher net margin — -1169.1% vs -1507.6%, a 338.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. TREASURE GLOBAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-2.7M).
Treasure Global Inc is a consumer technology company offering integrated digital commerce solutions, customer loyalty rewards programs, and cashless payment services. It primarily operates across Southeast Asian markets, serving individual users and small-to-medium enterprise clients.
SPAI vs TGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $227.7K | $182.5K |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $-2.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1936.2% | -953.5% |
| Net Margin | -1507.6% | -1169.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $227.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4K | $182.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.8K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $184.8K | $666.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $301.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $330.8K | $207.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0K | $293.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-232.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $-950.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | 68.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1936.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4148.6% | -953.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2073.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2167.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -229.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1070.9% | -391.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -174.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -85.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1507.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4940.1% | -1169.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2064.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2145.5% | 189.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1114.3% | -458.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -188.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -107.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $-17.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-116.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.7M | $12.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.1M | $16.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $504.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $531.4K | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-1.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.7M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1181.2% | -1318.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 353.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-941.8K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-606.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-976.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-960.0K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -1181.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1579.6% | -1318.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1092.7% | -822.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -519.5% | -635.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -577.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1614.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 353.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
