vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.7× Service Properties Trust). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -0.3%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs -17.0%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $-95.2M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
SVC vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVC
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
