vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERFACE INC (TILE) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $213.6M, roughly 1.6× Vital Farms, Inc.). Vital Farms, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 7.1%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vital Farms, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Vital Farms, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.2% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
Vital Tomosi Dairy Limited is a dairy processing company in Uganda. The company is a joint venture between Vital Capital Fund, "an impact investing fund primarily focused on Sub-Saharan Africa", and "Tomosi Dairy Farms, a Ugandan producer of dairy products".
TILE vs VITL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $331.0M | $213.6M |
| Net Profit | $23.6M | $16.3M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 81.5% | 54.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.40 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.4M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.5M | $198.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $184.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.4M | $162.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $335.0M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.3M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.6M | $147.4M |
| Q1 26 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $16.3M |
| Q1 26 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | 38.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.38 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.2M | $48.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $196.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $634.6M | $351.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $518.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.3M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4M | $93.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $108.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $156.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $150.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.2M | $133.2M |
| Q1 26 | $196.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $634.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $640.7M | $351.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $621.0M | $331.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.0M | $309.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.1M | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $501.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.2M | $238.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $518.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $481.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $430.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $359.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $344.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $320.5M |
| Q1 26 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-32.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 17.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-48.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $-761.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.4M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | -15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.02× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.68× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
VITL
| Eggs And Egg Related Products | $205.8M | 96% |
| Butter And Butter Related Products | $7.7M | 4% |
