vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Utz Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($341.0M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.0× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). Utz Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -18.0%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Utz Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.1% vs -76.3%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $16.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Utz Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
UTZ vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $341.0M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.3M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.3% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $365.5M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.2M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.1M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $768.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $696.9M | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.1M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.9M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $797.6M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $696.9M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $685.7M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0M | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.2M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.5M | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 23.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.1M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.3M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.67× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
