vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. (AGIG) and ConocoPhillips (COP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22251.6% vs 12.7%, a 22238.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ConocoPhillips posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.7% vs -116.8%). Over the past eight quarters, ConocoPhillips's revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
AGIG vs COP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-27.9K | $11.4B |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $1.4B |
| Gross Margin | — | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20546.5% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | 22251.6% | 12.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -116.8% | -10.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -273.1% | -37.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $1.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-27.9K | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.7K | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6K | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.3K | $14.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4K | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2K | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8K | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.7K | $12.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-281.8K | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.7K | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20546.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8915.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1648.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1037.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4016.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -418.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -276.3% | 30.9% |
| Q4 25 | 22251.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9042.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1623.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1008.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1001.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -216.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 342.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1392.4% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.60 | $1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.11 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $2.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $1.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $1.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $2.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6M | $7.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | $22.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $64.5B |
| Total Assets | $31.9M | $121.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.8K | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | $22.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.3B |
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $64.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $64.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $65.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $65.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $64.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $49.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $49.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $49.3B |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $121.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $122.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $122.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $124.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $122.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $96.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $96.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $95.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-552.1K | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0K | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.8K | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.09× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGIG
Segment breakdown not available.
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
