vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global-E Online Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.5M vs $475.7M, roughly 1.3× COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 0.9%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Global-E Online Ltd. operates a leading cross-border e-commerce enablement platform that helps direct-to-consumer brands and retail enterprises expand their international sales reach. It offers end-to-end services including localized checkout, payment processing, customs clearance, logistics coordination, and duty calculation, serving clients across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
CBSH vs GLBE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $625.5M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $5.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $625.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $404.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $189.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $489.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $313.9M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $-77.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $-54.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | -10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | -14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | -16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | -17.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $251.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $933.0M |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $251.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $205.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $207.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $207.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $229.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $933.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $909.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $884.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $869.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $878.7M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $1.1B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
