vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $32.8M, roughly 1.3× Cheche Group Inc.).
Cheche Group Inc. is a leading automotive digital service provider headquartered in China. It offers integrated solutions including auto insurance intermediary services, smart auto after-sales support, and connected vehicle technology products, serving individual car owners, auto dealerships, and insurance partners across domestic and select Southeast Asian markets.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
CCG vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.8M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $153.6K | — |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $153.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-492.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-196.7K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 45.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $193.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $203.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $193.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $203.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
