vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB) and ScanTech AI Systems Inc. (STAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALLAN JMB INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2M vs $631.0K, roughly 1.8× ScanTech AI Systems Inc.). CALLAN JMB INC. runs the higher net margin — -223.8% vs -1532.9%, a 1309.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CJMB vs STAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2M | $631.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.6M | $-9.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | -216.6% | -773.2% |
| Net Margin | -223.8% | -1532.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.58 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $631.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $884.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $346.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-17.9M |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.5% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | -216.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.9% | -773.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -84.2% | -440.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.4% | -4503.9% |
| Q4 25 | -223.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -188.8% | -1532.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -83.9% | -785.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.6% | -5174.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.61 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $17.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.8M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $5.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-659.0K | $-758.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-659.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-758.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-563.3K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-995.8K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -133.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -59.8% | -166.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -108.8% | -623.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CJMB
| Governmental | $1.1M | 91% |
| Other | $106.5K | 9% |
STAI
Segment breakdown not available.
