vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.4× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 17.0%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 11.7%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
COCO vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
