vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Freightos Ltd (CRGO) and Jayud Global Logistics Ltd (JYD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Jayud Global Logistics Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.2M vs $17.2M, roughly 2.3× Freightos Ltd). Jayud Global Logistics Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-376.1K vs $-7.6M).
Freightos is a software company that operates a booking and payments platform for international freight, using a SaaS-Enabled Marketplace model. The platform, which connects airlines, ocean liners, trucking carriers, freight forwarders, and importers or exporters, facilitates transactions at a run-rate of 1.4 million per year connecting 77 air and ocean carriers with thousands of freight forwarders and importers/exporters.
Jayud Global Logistics Ltd is a cross-border logistics service provider focused on offering end-to-end supply chain solutions including freight forwarding, warehousing, last-mile delivery, and customs clearance support. It primarily serves e-commerce merchants, manufacturing enterprises, and retail brands operating across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asian markets.
CRGO vs JYD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.2M | $39.2M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -86.7% | — |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $48321451.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $39.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $9.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-55.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 60.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -83.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -102.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -487.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1201.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -108.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -668.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -79.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -100.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -576.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | $48321451.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $47962821.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43839445.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $36231234.00 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $7844521.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.33 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $54.9M | $12.8M |
| Total Assets | $73.8M | $26.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $40.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $77.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.6M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $97.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.6M | $-152.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.6M | $-376.1K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44.2% | -1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-152.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-376.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | -44.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -160.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -257.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -69.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -197.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
