vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.9× Edible Garden AG Inc). On growth, Edible Garden AG Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -4.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Edible Garden AG Inc's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
EDBL vs MGLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $7.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-576.0K |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -8.3% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 67.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-576.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-356.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-529.0K |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 77.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 75.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 74.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 70.5% |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | -21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $11.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $22.7M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $27.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $35.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $33.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-908.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-908.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-533.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-770.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-893.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-658.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-562.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-776.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-940.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | -46.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | -23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
