vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edible Garden AG Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.5× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). Edible Garden AG Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.8M vs $-42.0M).
Edible Garden AG Inc is a U.S.-based sustainable agricultural company specializing in hydroponically grown fresh organic herbs, leafy greens, and specialty vegetables. It distributes its pesticide-free produce to leading grocery retailers, food service operators, and direct-to-consumer platforms across North America, prioritizing eco-friendly, low-water farming practices.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
EDBL vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -138.6% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-109.97 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -138.6% | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -126.3% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.2% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.7% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -123.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -143.6% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -128.5% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.3% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-109.97 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.38 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.58 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.47 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-330.78 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.32 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.02 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-341.14 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.5M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $20.6M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0K | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $734.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.8M | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.8% | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.4M | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | -66.8% | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.9% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -110.8% | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.5% | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EDBL
| Herbs Produce Floral | $3.6M | 86% |
| Other | $576.0K | 14% |
PCT
Segment breakdown not available.
