vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 3.4%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
LSTR vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.1M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.61× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.32× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSTR
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
