vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nomadar Corp. (NOMA) and Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nomadar Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($378.1K vs $227.7K, roughly 1.7× Safe Pro Group Inc.). Nomadar Corp. runs the higher net margin — -131.2% vs -1507.6%, a 1376.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
NOMA vs SPAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $378.1K | $227.7K |
| Net Profit | $-496.2K | $-3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 80.8% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | -77.2% | -1936.2% |
| Net Margin | -131.2% | -1507.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $227.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.1K | $101.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $330.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $643.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-496.2K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1936.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -77.2% | -4148.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2073.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2167.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1070.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -174.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1507.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -131.2% | -4940.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2064.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2145.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1114.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -188.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $146.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4M | $17.7M |
| Total Assets | $10.5M | $19.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $531.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1181.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-6.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-941.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-960.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1181.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1579.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1092.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -519.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -577.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
