vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and XPO, Inc. (XPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XPO, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 4.8%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, XPO, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 0.4%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
XPO, Inc., formerly XPO Logistics, is an American transportation company that conducts less-than-truckload shipping in North America. The company has headquarters in Greenwich, Connecticut, and has 592 locations globally. XPO is the second largest provider of less-than-truckload (LTL) services in North America, operating in 99 percent of all U.S. postal codes.
SCI vs XPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $101.0M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 46.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $106.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $150.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $237.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | 1.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $237.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $310.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $335.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $225.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $246.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $378.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $250.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $7.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $183.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 1.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $183.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $371.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $247.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $210.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $215.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $-57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $20.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | 2.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
XPO
Segment breakdown not available.
