vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI) and Trio Petroleum Corp (TPET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Safe Pro Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($227.7K vs $172.2K, roughly 1.3× Trio Petroleum Corp). Safe Pro Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1507.6% vs -1576.9%, a 69.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The China National Petroleum Corporation is a major national oil and gas corporation of China and one of the largest integrated energy groups in the world. Its headquarters are in Dongcheng District, Beijing. CNPC was ranked fourth in 2022 Fortune Global 500, a global ranking of the largest corporations by revenue.
SPAI vs TPET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $227.7K | $172.2K |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1936.2% | -1458.1% |
| Net Margin | -1507.6% | -1576.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -59.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $227.7K | $172.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.4K | $192.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $184.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $330.8K | $63.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0K | $72.9K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | 60.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.6% | 100.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | 100.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1936.2% | -1458.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4148.6% | -350.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2073.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2167.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1070.9% | -2395.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -174.6% | -2672.1% |
| Q4 25 | -1507.6% | -1576.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4940.1% | -720.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2064.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2145.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1114.3% | -3455.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -188.9% | -5548.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.14 | $-1.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.7M | $11.3M |
| Total Assets | $19.1M | $13.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $531.4K | $9.7M |
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-588.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1181.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-588.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-355.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-941.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $-563.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-960.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1181.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1579.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1092.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -519.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -577.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
