vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 14.3%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.7%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
A vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
