vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. (AGIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22251.6% vs -195.0%, a 22446.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -116.8%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
ABAT vs AGIG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $-27.9K |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-6.2M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 20546.5% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 22251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -116.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -273.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $-27.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $225.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $110.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $102.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.4K | $166.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.0K | $130.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $-281.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -894.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 20546.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -8915.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -1648.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -1037.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4151.4% | -4016.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4854.0% | -418.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -354.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -276.3% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 22251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -9042.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -1623.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -1008.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4031.0% | -1001.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5790.5% | -216.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 342.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1392.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-1.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $4.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $31.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $525.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.0M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $-552.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
